Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Giesea's avatar

Thank you for your testimony, brother.

artifex0's avatar

I think stories like this one demonstrate why honestly trying to have a accurate understanding of the world is one of our most important moral obligations. There's an enormous amount of pressure in society to adopt beliefs for social reasons- not just in religion, but in politics and everyday status competitions. We're often made to feel that thinking honestly about whether these beliefs are accurate is a deep betrayal and the act of a bad person. But an inaccurate model of the world produces inaccurate predictions, and so by giving up on accuracy, we also give up our ability to predict the effects our actions will have on other people, including those we love.

If this case, your people inaccurately believed that homosexuality was an unnatural, externally imposed desire that would lead to eternal torment. So, out of love, they taught you to hate it, not realizing that they were teaching you to hate yourself. In other cases, neglecting truth leads to wars and atrocities. The followers of Stalin chose to believe they were building a communist paradise, despite evidence to the contrary, because they lived in a culture that told them you had to believe that in order to be a good person. Likewise, the modern MAGA movement genuinely believes they're improving the lives of Americans; in that subculture, a good-faith effort to find out if that's true or not is a kind of betrayal. Many on the American left arrive at beliefs similarly.

When we arrive at a belief in bad faith, I think we're morally culpable when that belief causes harm. The most extreme mandate of that principle- that people should abandon religion and political identity entirely- is most likely morally supererogatory. However, I think the more modest charge of holding our beliefs lightly enough that we notice when they would cause harm should they turn out to be false is actually a moral obligation.

For that reason, I don't think your congregation should be entirely absolved of responsibility for the pain they've caused. Taking on that responsibility yourself by pointing out their love and your own self-recrimination is a respectable act of kindness, but I think sometimes an element of moral condemnation is also needed to incentivize change.

66 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?